Petition schedule 2025

Delivery Bikes

Ref: Pet. 469

Date received: 30.06.25

Subject: 

We, the undersigned residents who live in and the Ilford Lane area, are concerned about the delivery bikes.

They ride on the public footpath, putting the pedestrians at risk and parking in the allocated spaces which means loss of income for the council.

Therefore, we call on the council to take action

Number of signatories: 236

Progress:

09.07.25 - Acknowledgment Sent 

19.01.26 - Community Protection - 

I can confirm the Parking department are enforcing all delivery bikes and the Community Protection Taskforce officers do engage with businesses to assure the bikes are not causing anti-social behaviour. CCTV also report bikes to parking who then take appropriate action.

Licensing department have also checked conditions for use of delivery services for premises who have signed up to Uber eats, Just eats and other platforms.

Petition Closed.

Francis Way Petition

Ref: Pet. 470

Date received: 30.06.25

Subject: 

We the undersigned petition the Council to re consider School Streets along Loxford Lane, Ilford. or Permit Parking in St Francis Way and to be monitored by parking controls each day. Or consideration to double yellow lines along the whole of St Francis Way active between 1400-1600. Also monitored by parking control. If none of the above possible. Restricted access to St Francis way during the hours of 1400-1600

Number of signatories: 13

Progress:

08.07.25 - Acknowledgment Sent

31.07.25 - Highways - The petitioned request for new permit parking controls in Francis Way has been added to our works programme for future consultation.  There are already a large number of other requests waiting on the programme and progression is subject to ongoing resources and funding.  For this reason, it is likely that all new schemes being added to the programme will be consulted after March 2026.

Petition Closed.

School Streets Staines Road

Ref: Pet. 471

Date received: 30.06.25

Subject:

We ask Redbridge Council to Introduce a 'School Street' on Staines Road to tackle severe traffic congestion around Loxford School. The area experiences gridlock during drop-off and pick-up times, posing safety risks for children and worsening air pollution. By restricting vehicle access at key times, a 'School Street' would create a safer, healthier environment for pupils, parents, and local residents.

Number of signatories: 57

Progress:

08.07.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

01.12.25 - Highways - “ The Council thanks the Petitioner and the residents of Staines Road for submitting the petition. It notes that the volume of children travelling by car to attend Loxford School is creating traffic and parking issues leading to congestion, road safety and air quality issues on Staines Road. On occasion over recent years the Council has focused enforcement at this location. However, it acknowledges that has not resolved the issues faced by residents. Council Officers have recently discussed the issues at Loxford School, as the same issues have been raised by residents living in roads off of Loxford Lane in the vicinity of the school. It is not possible to implement a School Street on Staines Road as it is not adjacent to a school. The Council currently does not have any other proposals to take forward to alleviate the situation.”

Petition Closed.

South Park Terrace

Ref: Pet. 472

Date received: 30.06.25

Subject:

Hello, in light of the recent car accident on top of our road. I am seeking support from residents to sign a petition to give to the council to consider traffic calming measures on our road

Number of signatories: 39

Progress:

08.07.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

25.07.25 - Highways - “Thank you for your petition dated 4th July 2025 regarding traffic conditions on South Park Terrace.

Road safety is a priority for the Council and as such it has a Collision Reduction Scheme Programme that provides physical measures such as traffic calming, traffic management measures and pedestrian crossing improvements, you can read more about the Council's approach to road safety in our Sustainable Transport Strategy here. These schemes are funded by both the Council and Transport for London. Schemes included in this Programme are selected on the number of collisions that have occurred resulting in slight, serious or fatal injuries and there being appropriate physical measures that can be introduced to reduce these collisions. You can read more about our in year programme that not only covers road safety but also areas such as resurfacing, street lighting, flood alleviation, and other schemes here.

We have developed a matrix to assess and prioritise schemes, which includes consideration of collision data, traffic survey data and other highway related factors. This is also to ensure that resources are targeted where most needed and we can develop a forward programme based on priority.

South Park Terrace has been assessed using the Prioritisation Matrix and this location is not indicated as a high priority for road safety improvements at this time. It is important to note that the Council receives hundreds of requests for various traffic measures each year and demand far exceeds the available resources. Consequently, only a handful of the requests received each year can be taken forward.

Whilst I appreciate you may be disappointed this location is not on that priority list for this year, this is because the roads listed in the programme had a number of incidents recorded on them or they had speeding recorded from the traffic surveys undertaken and they still result in a higher priority than this location.”

Petition Closed.

Request for Traffic Calming Measures on Aldborough Road North

Ref: Pet. 473

Date received: 27.06.25

Subject:

We write on behalf of the residents of Buryside Close and the surrounding areas with deep concern regarding road safety. To access Buryside Close one must use Aldborough Road North, an essential but busy highway. We feel afraid to leave Buryside Close because of the design of the junction and the speed of cars using Aldborough Road North. We request a traffic survey and subsequently, traffic calming measures to be installed post-haste.

There are parked cars on both sides of the entrance to Buryside close, blocking our view of oncoming traffic and preventing traffic on Aldborough road north from seeing vehicles joining from Buryside Close. Therefore, judging when it is safe to join Aldborough Road North is incredibly difficult. We often warn visitors, especially those with infant passengers, to remain vigilant when leaving Buryside close and use more than due caution.

We recognise that “SLOW” has been painted on both sides of the junction. However, with all due respect, this has not made any difference which is why we have decided to write to you. It remains unduly dangerous for us to travel from our homes. Since Aldborough Road North is a straight, wide and long highway, many road users are happy to flagrantly disregard the speed limit at all times of the day. Alarmingly, this also includes when Children are walking to and from the local schools and pre-school. Drivers can simply ignore the rules because there are no traffic calming measures on that portion of the road.

In my wife’s and my personal experience, which the undersigned all relate to, there have been many times when we have been close to being involved in a collision just trying to leave Buryside Close. Even with our Hypervigilance, these near misses are far too common for our comfort. Principally die to the obstructed view from the cars parked very close to the junction on both sides, we are compelled to go past the give way line to judge when it is absolutely safe to join the traffic. Unfortunately, it is not unusual for us to be subject to undue road rage and vile abuse from other road users, who do not see us pull out onto Aldborough Road North and continue travelling at high speeds.

We believe that, to a large extent, introducing traffic calming measures at the junction will reduce the risk of collisions. We recognise that there will be some concerns from the emergency services in putting certain speed controls, such as speed humps, on Aldborough Road North. However, it is crucial to consider that a reduced risk of collision will mean the emergency services can focus their resources on pressing matters rather than avoidable matters.

The obstructed junction, paired with the speeding vehicles, has scarred us. Due to the many dangers, we warn children to play well away from the entrance of Buryside Close. Since it is clear that without traffic calming measures, collisions are more likely to occur, we would like to request that a traffic survey be carried out and subsequently, speed controls be introduced. The determination of what traffic calming measures to use will be important and we request to be consulted before any decision is made.

As proud residents of the London Borough of Redbridge, we would like to keep our streets safe and reduce the number of collisions. The measures we are petitioning to introduce will alter the driver behaviour for the better. We want to ensure that road safety is at the forefront of their minds, because for far too long, the lax nature of traffic controls near our junction has led to irresponsible driving. This needs to change before we have any fatal collisions.
We will send a copy of this letter to the Deputy Mayor of Redbridge, Cllr Howard, who is also our ward councillor. Thank you very much and we look forward to receiving your response.

Number of signatories: 24

Progress:

04.07.25 - Acknowledgment sent 

04.07.25 - Highways - "Thank you for your petition received on 27th June 2025 regarding traffic conditions on Aldborough Road North.

Road safety is a priority for the Council and as such it has a Collision Reduction Scheme Programme that provides physical measures such as traffic calming, traffic management measures and pedestrian crossing improvements, you can read more about the Council's approach to road safety in our Sustainable Transport Strategy here. These schemes are funded by both the Council and Transport for London. Schemes included in this Programme are selected on the number of collisions that have occurred resulting in slight, serious or fatal injuries and there being appropriate physical measures that can be introduced to reduce these collisions. You can read more about our in year programme that not only covers road safety but also areas such as resurfacing, street lighting, flood alleviation, and other schemes here.

We have developed a matrix to assess and prioritise schemes, which includes consideration of collision data, traffic survey data and other highway related factors. This is also to ensure that resources are targeted where most needed and we can develop a forward programme based on priority.

Traffic surveys were undertaken on Aldborough Road North in December 2023 and the closest survey site to Buryside Close (outside No. 515 Aldborough Road North) indicates 85%ile traffic speeds (the speed at which 85% of vehicles are travelling at or below – a commonly used variable in traffic/highway engineering and speed enforcement) of 33.7 mph in a northbound direction and 32.0 mph in a southbound direction.

Aldborough Road North is not on our current programme for road safety improvements, however we have assessed this location using the Prioritisation Matrix and I will ensure that Aldborough Road North is included on our priority list of locations to be investigated for a road safety scheme in our future programme.

It is important to note that we receive hundreds of requests for various traffic measures each year and demand far exceeds the available resources. Consequently, only a few of the requests received each year can be taken forward."

Petition Closed.

Petition to Request a Zebra Crossing on Ley Street

Ref: Pet. 474

Date received: 18.09.25

Subject:

Dear Redbridge Council or relevant officer,

We, the undersigned residents of Ley Street, Jaffe Road, Carriage Mews, Brisbane Road, Thorold Road and the Ward Councillors - Cllr Saima Ahmed and Cllr Shoaib Patel, urgently request the installation of a zebra crossing on Ley Street in the vicinity of Tesco Express, Punjabi Community Centre (Polling Station) and Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple.

Ley Street is a busy and often dangerous road for pedestrians. There is currently no dedicated crossing point for pedestrians in this stretch, despite its heavy use by families, elderly residents, and visitors to key community facilities including the Tesco
Express, petrol station, community centre, temple etc. The absence of a crossing puts
residents in constant danger as they attempt to navigate high-speed traffic to reach¡
these places. Children and parents from Christchurch Primary school and Seven King's
School who regularly use the bus stop are also at constant risk when crossing to get to
the other side of the road.

The urgency of this matter is further underscored by the recent incidents along Ley Street, including a hit-and-run accident just further down the road, which highlights the dangers faced by pedestrians daily. Reports of near-misses and risky crossings by vulnerable groups, such as children and elderly individuals, are a common concern.

The installation of a zebra crossing would;

1. Enhance Safety: Create a safe point for pedestrians to cross this busy road, reducing the risk of accidents and fatalities
2. Support the Community: Ensure that residents can access Tesco Express, Community Centre and the temple and be able to access their properties safely and conveniently, fostering community activity and cohesion.
3. Encourage Sustainable Transport: Promote walking and reduce dependency on cars for short journey, aligning with environmental goals.

We kindly urge the council to prioritise this request and conduct an immediate assessment of Ley Street to determine the most appropriate location for a zebra crossing. Addressing this issue now would show a proactive commitment to preventing future accidents and enhancing the safety of our community.

Thank you for considering this vital request. we look forward to your response and a timely resolution to this pressing safety concern.

Number of signatories: 201

Progress:

19.09.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

10.10.25 - Highways - “Thank you for your correspondence and for forwarding the petition submitted by residents of Ley Street, Jaffe Road, Carriage Mews, Brisbane Road, Thorold Road, and the wider community.

We acknowledge the concerns raised regarding pedestrian safety on Ley Street at this location. We understand the importance of ensuring safe access to these key community facilities, especially for vulnerable road users including children, elderly residents, and families.

While we recognise the community’s desire for a controlled pedestrian crossing, the provision of such infrastructure at this location presents significant challenges due to site-specific constraints (including road geometry, visibility limitations, the proximity of junctions and driveways, presence of bus stops and current on-street parking provision which may affect the feasibility and safety of installing a zebra crossing).

To ensure a thorough understanding of the concerns and to explore potential options, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you on site. This would allow us to assess the location in detail and discuss the challenges involved.

Officers from our Traffic Engineering team will contact you to discuss your availability for a site meeting and make the necessary arrangements.”

Petition Closed.

Waylands Court Staines Road

Ref: Pet. 475

Date received: 18.09.25

Subject:

From the residents of Staines Road, Eton Road, Gordon Road and South Park Road. For the removal of the illegal 2nd floor upwards extension.

in 2023 Redbridge planning refused permission to build an upwards two floor extension on top of Waylands Court, Staines Road. In 2024 Redbridge planning again refused permission for the same extension.
Again in 2024 the Secretary of State, Planning inspectorate also refused an appeal by the developer on the grounds of it being unsuitable for the area and loss of light to residents in Gordon Road.
As the developer has illegally disobeyed these decisions, we, the undersigned, neighbors and residents of the surrounding arca demand that this illegal extension is taken down now.

Number of signatories: 148

Progress:

26.09.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

03.10.25 - Highways - “The Council recognises and shares the communities’ concerns with the actions of the developer at Waylands Court. As a result, the Council has served an Enforcement Notice against the unlawful additional storey, requiring it to be removed. The developer has appealed that Notice and the appeal will be heard by a central Government body, the Planning Inspectorate. The Council will robustly defend the Notice at appeal, to protect local residents from the actions of the developer.

The developer has recently submitted an application to the Council for retrospective approval for that additional storey, which is currently open for comment for local residents. The Council will ensure the application is thoroughly and robustly assessed, taking into account all comments received from local residents.”

Petition Closed.

Tudor Close

Ref: Pet. 476

Date received: 23.09.25

Subject:

We, the undersigned residents of Tudor Close, Woodford Green IG8 0LF, are writing to formally request that Redbridge Council review the current parking restrictions on our street and consider granting an exemption to allow partial footway parking, or implementing other appropriate measures.

Tudor Close is a narrow cul-de-sac where the legal restriction on footway parking (as per the Greater London Council General Powers Act 1974) creates a serious dilemma. if vehicles park fully on the carriageway, access is obstructed for other road users, including emergency services, waste collection vehicles, and delivery vans. However, parkin partially on the pavement, even two wheels, has resulted in the issuance of Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) to multiple residents.

This situation places residents in an untenable position: abide by the law and risk blocking the road, or park more practically and receive fines. this has understandably caused frustration and concern, particularly around safety and emergency access.

We therefore respectfully request:

1. That the council conduct a site assessment to determine whether Tudor Close qualifies for an exemption to permit partial footway parking;
2. That, if Feasible, the council install appropriate signage and markings to allow two-wheel footway parking on one or both sides of the street;
3. That PCN enforcement be suspended temporarily pending the outcome of this review (or be treated leniently where justified by access issues)
4. That local residents be consulted in any future changes to the parking layout or enforcement policy for the street.

we would appreciate a response at your earliest convenience and would welcome the opportunity to discuss this further.

Number of signatories: 11

Progress:

26.09.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

03.10.25 - Highways - “The teams resources and funding for this years parking works programme are already fully committed. We will therefore add this request to next years programme for April 2026 to March 2027.”

Petition Closed

Counties Estate Parking

Ref: Pet. 477

Date received: 20.11.25

Subject:

Following the recent parking restriction changes in central Wanstead, residents on the
Counties Estate (particularly Rutland Road, Grosvenor Road, and nearby streets) have
observed a marked increase in commuter parking. Cars are being left all day, reducing
available parking for residents and visitor

1. General Consensus
-Most residents agree that the problem has worsened since the new Wanstead parking zones were introduced, with displacement now affecting previously unaffected residential streets.

-There is a shared concern about accessibility, congestion, and the long-term impact on local quality of life and retailers in the high street if no action is taken.

2. Main lssues Raised
-Displacement effect: Cars previously parked near stations are now filling neighbouring streets such as Rutland Road and Grosvenor Road.

-Loss of resident access: Residents struggle to find nearby parking especially during weekdays.

-Safety and access concerns: Narrow roads and poor parking (e.g. blocking driveways, large vans) are obstructing access for waste collection and emergency vehicles.

-Unfair burden: Residents feel penalised for problems caused by the council's zoning choices rather than by their own actions.

3. Range of Views on Solutions
A. Targeted time-restricted parking (broad support): 

-Many residents suggest a simple, limited-hours restriction (e.9. 8.30-L0.00 am or 12-1 pm) to deter commuters while allowing flexibility for visitors and local workers

-This model is cited positively as used near Redbridge and other stations.

B. Full residents 'parking schemes (divided opinion):
- Some residents (e.g. from Grosvenor Road and other nearby streets) say such
schemes solved similar problems in their areas.
- Others oppose them, warning they are expensive, shift problems elsewhere, and
"play into the council's hands" by generating revenue.

C. Support for a review and consultation (strong agreement):
Most commenters agree the Council should urgently review the current parking
arrangements and consult all affected streets to find a fair, practical solution before
extending or amending schemes further.

4. Concerns and Wider Points
-Visitor impact: Residents worry friends, family, and tradespeople will face unnecessary restrictions or charges.

-Local worker parking: Some note that many cars belong to local shop and salon staff rather than commuters.
-Council trust: A few residents express frustration with perceived "parking wars" and lack of joined-up planning, seeing changes as financially motivated rather than resident-led.
-Equity: There's a strong feeling that all streets around the stations should be considered together to avoid piecemeal displacement.

5. Petition Summary
Nick Watt (Rutland Road) has launched a Change.org petition requesting:
. An urgent parking review of the Counties Estate within one month.
. Measurement of displacement levels caused by the new restrictions.
. Resident consultation on fair, balanced parking controls that protect access for
those who live here.

6. Suggested Next Steps for Councilors
1. Acknowledge the displacement problem formally.
2. Commission a short traffic and parking impact study across affected streets.
3. Hold a resident consultation {e.9. drop-in or survey) to assess prefered options.
4. Report findings and potential measures (time-limited restrictions, resident permits, mixed-use models, etc.) before any new zones are implemented.

Number of signatories: 72

Progress:

26.09.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

08.12.25 - Highways - “In response to parking concerns raised from the Counties estate, consultation letters were delivered to local properties today (01-12-2025) outlining proposals to extend the existing Wanstead D (WD) permit parking area to further roads.  Residents are encouraged to have their say by completing an online questionnaire available at: https://engage.redbridge.gov.uk/2025-p16. The consultation closes on Sunday 21 December after which time all responses received will be reported for full consideration.  Residents will be notified of the outcome once the decision is known.”

Petition Closed

Glebelands Avenue

Ref: Pet. 478

Date received: 30.11.25

Subject:

We the undersigned petition the council to We, the undersigned residents of Glebelands Avenue, E18, are writing to urgently request the implementation of comprehensive road safety and residential protection measures on our street. These include:

• A reduction of the speed limit to 20mph

• Installation of speed humps and elevated entry treatments

• Speed enforcement cameras 

• Designation of a residents-only parking zone

Dear Redbridge Council,

We, the undersigned residents of Glebelands Avenue, E18, are writing to urgently request the implementation of comprehensive road safety and residential protection measures on our street. These include:

- A reduction of the speed limit to 20mph
- Installation of speed humps and elevated entry treatments
- Speed enforcement cameras
- Designation of a residents-only parking zone

Glebelands Avenue is a quiet residential street, home to families with young children, elderly residents, and frequent pedestrian activity. The road is narrow, visibility is compromised by parked cars, and every house has a driveway—yet exiting safely is often difficult due to the speed and volume of passing traffic.
Although Glebelands Avenue is listed in the 2025/26 Highways Capital Programme, we were informed by traffic enforcement officers that no specific budget has been allocated to our street. Any improvements will be subject to confirmation of funding at the outcome of a consultation exercise, and only if budget permits. This uncertainty is deeply concerning given the urgent safety risks we face.
The street is frequently used as a shortcut by non-residents travelling at high speeds to reach the nearby train station, creating a dangerous and disruptive environment. One resident’s child was nearly struck by a speeding vehicle—a chilling reminder that action must be taken before a tragedy occurs. In addition to safety concerns, the excessive traffic contributes to elevated noise levels that affect the wellbeing of everyone on the street.
We believe that introducing a “20 is Plenty” zone, physical traffic calming measures, speed cameras, and a residents-only parking zone would:
-  Reduce the risk of collisions and injuries
-  Improve driveway safety and pedestrian visibility
-  Lower noise pollution and enhance residential quality of life
-  Deter non-resident traffic and discourage shortcutting
-  Align Glebelands Avenue with other Redbridge streets already benefiting from similar interventions
-  Support Redbridge’s Vision Zero goals and Sustainable Transport Strategy

We respectfully ask that this petition be prioritised within the Highways Capital Programme and considered under the “Traffic Calming and Road Safety,” “Road Safety Zones,” and “Neighbourhood Improvements” initiatives. We are willing to engage with Council officers and provide further input to support the design and implementation of these measures.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your continued commitment to making Redbridge safer, cleaner, and more liveable.

Number of signatories: 40

Progress:

05.12.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

08.12.25 - Highways - "Thank you for your petition regarding road safety and residential protection measures on Glebelands Avenue. We appreciate the concerns raised by residents and your commitment to improving safety in the area."

Please find below the Council’s response to the measures requested:

1. Reduction in Speed Limit to 20 MPH - The Council is currently consulting on proposals to introduce a 20 MPH Zone in the South Woodford area (between the North Circular and Hermon Hill, Hollybush Hill, and the borough boundary with Waltham Forest). This proposed zone includes Glebelands Avenue;

2. Installation of Speed Humps and Elevated Entry Treatments - As part of the 20 MPH Zone proposals, consideration was given to installing traffic calming measures on roads where traffic survey and collision data identified a need. Glebelands Avenue was not identified as a location requiring such measures based on current data;

3. Provision of Speed Enforcement Cameras - Safety cameras (speed enforcement cameras) are managed by Transport for London (TfL). Historically, local authorities could propose sites for consideration, but installation was subject to strict criteria, including a minimum number of serious or fatal speed-related collisions and traffic speeds. Based on current data, Glebelands Avenue does not meet these thresholds. TfL has also advised that their safety camera programme is currently on hold, including any review of site prioritisation methodology.

We understand residents’ concerns and will continue to monitor conditions on Glebelands Avenue. The outcome of the current consultation will inform next steps, and any future improvements will be subject to available funding and prioritisation within the Highways Capital Programme.

Thank you again for bringing these matters to our attention. Should you have any further questions or wish to provide additional input, please do not hesitate to contact us.”

Petition Closed

Pay and Display Bays - High Road IG3 8EE

Ref: Pet. 479

Date received: 04.12.25

Subject:

Request for Additional Business Permit Bays and Introdcution of Pay & Display / Short Stay Bays - High Road, Seven Kings, Ilford, IG3 8EE

Location: Outside 871-879 High Road, Seven Kings, Ilford IG3 8EE and 519-850 High Road, Seven Kings, Ilford IG3

We, the local business owners and representatives, respectfully request that the council consider:

1. The addition of more business permit bays to support local businesses and their employees.
2. The introduction of new pay and display and short-stay parking bays to improve accessibility for customers visiting local shops and businesses.

In this particular stretch of Seven Kings High Road, the nearest business permit bays are a considerable distance away compared to other stretched of the same road. This presents practical difficulties for business owners and employees who rely on convenient access.

Furthermore, the lack of pay and display and short-stay parking bays in this area causes customer hardship, as visitors are often unable to find appropriate parking nearby. Introducing such bays would not only alleviate parking pressures but would also be highly beneficial to the local economy, ecouraging greater footfall and supporting the sustainability of small and independent businesses operating along this part of High Road, Seven Kings, Ilford, IG3

Adequate parking facilities are essential to maintaining footfall, supporting small businesses, and promoting economic activity in the area.  

Number of signatories: 19

Progress:

08.12.25 - Acknowledgement sent.

08.01.25 - Highways - "We have added this petition request to next years parking works programme covering the period April 2026 to March 2027.  There are already a large number of other requests on the programme and the rate of progression with the programme will be subject to available resources, funding and prioritisation."

Petition Closed